Prince Charles and his spouse Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall are on a three-day go to to the African nation to symbolize the Queen as head of the Commonwealth. Their go to comes after the UK’s first flight of asylum seekers sure for Rwanda was grounded by authorized challenges towards the coverage.
The future King has reportedly mentioned in non-public the Government’s controversial migration coverage was “appalling”, in line with The Times.
READ MORE: Prince Charles and Camilla ‘visibly moved’ as they go to genocide victims in Rwanda
A Clarence House spokesman mentioned Charles wouldn’t be commenting on “supposed remarks made in non-public” besides to say “the prince is politically impartial” and that coverage was a matter for the Government.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson can be within the Rwandan capital Kigali for the Commonwealth summit.
The Prime Minister’s spokesman mentioned the migration coverage was not one thing Mr Johnson was targeted on on the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting summit.
He emphasised challenges dealing with the Commonwealth equivalent to sustainability, local weather change and ladies’ training have been the precedence.
Clarence House confirmed Charles and Mr Johnson will meet for a cup of tea and catch-up on Friday morning, June 24.
Downing Street added it’s “unlikely” the UK’s Rwanda asylum coverage might be mentioned.
Charles has been criticised prior to now for expressing his private views on the atmosphere as members of the Royal Family ought to stay neutral and politically impartial.
Conservative MP Tom Hunt has warned Charles ought to “be extremely cautious going ahead”.
As a outcome, Express.co.uk requested readers whether or not Charles ought to interact within the UK’s migration coverage throughout his go to to the nation.
In a ballot that ran from 10am on Sunday, June 19, to 6pm on Thursday, June 23, Express.co.uk requested: “Should Prince Charles wade in on UK migration plan on Rwanda journey?”
A complete of two,502 folks responded with the dominant response, gaining 93 p.c of votes (2,336 folks), being “no”, Charles mustn’t wade in on UK migration plan throughout his go to to Rwanda.
Just six p.c (139 folks) mentioned “sure” he ought to, whereas one p.c (27 folks) mentioned they didn’t know both means.
Dozens of readers shared their ideas within the feedback beneath the accompanying article.
While username Scottydoggy mentioned: “Absolutely not. It’s a political matter and he shouldn’t have any enter.”
Others commented he wanted to comply with the Queen’s exemplary behaviour and never share his opinions.
Username Cookyz mentioned: “He ought to do as his mom has all the time executed and thoughts his personal enterprise!!!”
Username JanetWCQ1958 wrote: “Best to say nothing and keep out of politics like his mom has.”
Another, username F252 mentioned: “He ought to maintain quiet publicly about Government enterprise.”
However, some readers thought that Charles was entitled to share his opinions on the migration coverage throughout his journey.
Username jackthelass mentioned: “He has an opinion, he can say it – who’s going to cease him.”
And username Will-l am Not mentioned: “He’s entitled to an opinion like anybody else.”